Toxic Male Masculinity

       

     Let's talk about a very important subject. It's called Toxic Male Masculinity. Do you know what it is and can you define the symptoms of it? Another topic to try and understand about COVID-19. What exactly is COVID-19? Could it be this thing we should call Toxic Male Masculinity? How long has such an issue affected those around us? Can we see it and call it out? Many questions can be asked about Toxic Male Masculinity or maybe COVID-19. Let's dig deeper into what has been an issue longer than anyone can remember. 

      What is Toxic Male Masculinity and when did it start? What if I told you that Toxic Male Masculinity started in the biblical times and you have read a lot about it if you read the bible. Toxic Male Masculinity is mostly defined as this "strong man" who does anything without a care in the world what people think. It goes as far as describing it to where people commit to doing evil things and not caring about how it effects people. Do we know a lot of men like this? I'm sure you do. Who does Toxic Male Masculinity effect? It can affect anyone. It's more common in men, but women can catch it too. How is it transmitted? Anyone who listens to men that say "women and children should submit to their husbands and fathers." 

      This is an old tradition that should be broken. Now more than ever women and millennials are standing up for themselves not only by voting, but for running for a political position. People of color are also creating diversity in the workplace now more than ever. Why is this? Could it be that an old tradition of Toxic Male Masculinity is slowly being broken? Is the old "white privilege" also being challenged? 

     Here in the United States, we are showing that Toxic Male Masculinity will not define us because of Donald Trump and how he's treated this country over the last 4 years. But have you looked at the Democratic Presidential Nominee? Does he show signs of Toxic Male Masculinity? What if I told you that I wasn't the only one to catch on to Joe Biden and his Toxic Male Masculinity. If you watched the debates in 2019, you would have figured that Joe Biden had attacked all the top Democratic challengers. What did the candidates do about it? What if I told you that Elizabeth Warren, Amy Klobuchar, Bernie Sanders, Kamala Harris, Pete Buttigieg, Cory Booker, Julian Castro, and maybe even Andrew Yang made a plan to subtly show the Democratic audience how much of a Toxic Male Joe Biden was in the debates and they decided to bring in Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama into the plan to see if anyone noticed the Toxic Male Masculinity in Joe Biden. Did you notice it? I sure did. Could you call it out if you really did notice it on the street? 

      What causes Toxic Male Masculinity? Maybe it's someone who hasn't been shown the proper love that they need and decided to "toughen up" because someone lead them on to believe that showing your true emotions isn't accepted by society. Did you know that hiding your true emotions can cause mental health issues? Did you know that society says that if you show too much of an emotion or emotions that they claim that you are mentally ill? Apparently there isn't a happy medium in there somewhere or at least what society deems "normal." Are we going to let society tell us what to do? What if there is someone out there who has had a plan all along and knows how to combat this type of thing? Would you be able to point them out on the street? Do you even know who they are? 

      What combats Toxic Male Masculinity? Simple. Just don't tolerate it and let it love something else. Hate does not belong anywhere. Even leaders in other countries have Toxic Male Masculinity. Everyone has at least noticed that. Voting is very important especially if you want leaders that understand and can take on what their people want out of a leader.       

     What are the signs of Toxic Male Masculinity? What if it hits close to home? How about letting a significant other having complete control over your social media and them changing it up to how they deem is necessary for their liking. If you say things such as "My significant other wouldn't like it if I did..." or "My significant other wouldn't like it if I said..." If you really have to ask your significant other to do or say something, then you and your significant other suffer from Toxic Male Masculinity. If any of your friends and family do the same thing, then they too suffer from Toxic Male Masculinity. The only way to not suffer from Toxic Male Masculinity is being yourself and not caring what others think (that includes your friends, family, and even your significant other). 

      So it's time to show up, stand up, and speak up against Toxic Male Masculinity (or maybe COVID-19) by voting for people who truly have your best interests at heart. Because if you don't then you could see a complete dictatorship in some sort of way. Of course you don't want that now do you? Think it over and remember who you vote for because it could come back on you and you will later regret it. That's not something you want to carry on your conscience or on your back for the rest of your life. So when you wear a mask, are you in support of Toxic Male Masculinity or are you against it? You be the judge. 

My Formal Speech

     

    My name is Jennifer R. Elliott and I am from Iowa. I am proud to call Iowa my home even though it has turned the United States upside down with it's politics. In this day and age, it has actually Moved America Forward For All when you least expected it. It gave us Bill Clinton in the 90's, and now it gave us Barack Obama for 2 terms, Hillary Clinton only by the caucuses, and now it could give America it's president and vice president. It would be an honor to call Elizabeth Warren and Kamala Harris as teammates all because of counties that have similarities with the two select women. Other counties in Iowa gave us Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, and Barack Obama with their similarities in names. My name personally may change, but will it change who I really am and who I am meant to be? Maybe or maybe not. I will let fate or even God himself answer that burning question. 

     I am currently the Iowa Millennial Moving America Forward For All, but in June of 2019 I got a request from Gregory T. Christensen to join the team. At first I thought, "Why not?" and wanted to give him the information right away, but then decided that it was best that he had to prove what it takes to have close to the same mind frame as I had. Time would tell if he could prove what it takes to become an Iowa Millennial Moving America Forward For All. I have recently selected him to be my partner in this business. Is it finished? Not yet. It's only getting started. At least when the time is right. We will be known as the Iowa Millennials Moving America Forward For All.

     Gregory T. Christensen is not only someone I just currently met, but he's someone from my past. Not a single soul has known about this until now. I've known him since 1999 and I hope to continue my life with him through whatever our journey turns out to be. I will be one happy woman to be with Gregory and fulfill our dreams together. He was the inspiration behind what I have done and I couldn't thank him more for being there even though during tough times, he couldn't be. If it weren't for him, who knows where we would be sitting politically. Thank you so much Gregory and all that you have done to carry me through these rough times. I love you more than you will ever know. 

     Over the many years of studying people and the things that they wanted, I finally saw what we needed to do, but I'm sure other people will pick up the answers when they least expect it. Currently when you scream for Medicare For All, socialized medicine, a low costing lifestyle, among other things, I've heard them among other presidential candidates. When it comes to those smaller issues, I've been listening to those and I will take them with me as long as someone is willing to listen and take on these issues with me. I personally think that Joe Biden can't handle everything that needs to be done, because it will take longer than 4 years to get everything into place. We need a better candidate or future candidates that will work with me and the American people to get through all our struggles and make sure that we create a better planet for our future. Because right now, Earth is our only planet even though scientists are trying to find other planets for us to inhabit.

     With the whole COVID-19 debacle going on, just realize that it's Chinese Numerology. We have actually had a lot worse things happen than that. Even though everyone else shouldn't worry about it, it brought a new sense to me. COVID-19 was on a more personal level for me. It not only discussed the numbers between me and another person, but it showed me how much potential I had and it made me reach for bigger heights than I would ever discover. The things I saw and went through over COVID-19 would take a toll, but would make me gain a greater sense of things around me. Things that would happen in the future and things in the past. I discovered a lot and I will take it with me in the future to remind me how thankful I should be for myself and the things I have done and went through. My main motto is this: Go Big, or Go Home using the KISS method. 

     Right now we should be looking at the elections Summer of 2020. Yes, I'm talking about the primaries. Do you even know who you voted for especially when it comes to the presidents? Now is the time to look back on those results so we can be a more accurate nation. It's time that the American people receive the truth. We should be calling on it instead of just believing on hearsay. I know what the outcome should have been, but do you? Time for the American people to demand the truth so that they are not lead astray. So I call on the American people to demand the truth and the states that had primaries to expose that truth. I know we aren't supposed to look on the past, but this is important and the truth should be exposed so we don't live a lie. Other Democratic candidates should do the same thing. It's the way to try and unite us all. 

     It was great to be a part of this mission working from home, but now it should be time that I work with others so that we can continue to Move America Forward For All. Gregory and I would like to thank everyone who had stood with us and for us so that we can complete this mission in giving the American people what they truly desired for years: a Democratic Nation. Raise a glass in cheering for a brighter future because we all shine brighter than the sun!  

IA MASTARS

      

     What is IA MASTARS? You are about to dive into the world of a project turned self-business of the political world, but let's get into the details that make up the political X Factor. 

     IA MASTARS now means Iowans Making America Stronger Together Again Religiously Speaking. Started June 19, 2019 as IA Mil MAFFA by Jennifer R. Elliott (formerly, now Jennifer R. Christensen), the project would be the last boost needed to build the last piece of Moving America Forward For All. Let's get into the chronological details that lead up to this project. 

     In 2016, Jennifer knew that the presidential election would go haywire, but would use her gut and knowledge to form a plan to reverse the effects. In December 2016, Jennifer would message the then White House under the Obama Administration on Facebook asking if then president, Barack Obama, could use his presidential powers to call on a second general election. Barack Obama decided that it would be best to recount the ballots. Had Jennifer's idea been transferred to the president to influence him? Who knew. It may have been a loss to both Jennifer and Barack, but Jennifer would continue the trek. The messages are currently archived. 

     In mid-April of 2017, Jennifer would send a physical letter to the Supreme Court in Washington, D.C. addressing it to the notable, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, saying that she (Jennifer) would take on the Trump Administration due to the enormous amount of corruption that unfolded. It would take at least two weeks before it's arrival in Washington D.C. It would be within the first week of May 2017 when the Mueller Investigation would begin and what it would find, would be up to the counsel. Had Jennifer influenced the Mueller Investigation? One could ponder.

     In November of 2017, there would be local elections all over the state of Iowa, but what would hit home for Jennifer is that her town of Shenandoah, Iowa would invest themselves in corruption by news outlets in the town, KMA Broadcasting and The Valley News, announcing the day before if not in the early morning hours of election day, that voting would be from 8am to 12pm. Only to discover that day or the day after, the information was erased from Facebook posts and the internet. Jennifer would also discover that Clarinda, Iowa had also posed a corruption threat of their own by holding a Christmas event the same day to sway voters away from voting. Jennifer had learned about this when talking to a Page County Iowa Democrat after asking if there was a Democratic group to attend. Jennifer would tend to an idea to save the 2018 elections as she knew that they would be hacked again, but this time in favor of the Democrats.

     In February of 2018, Jennifer would discuss with Page County Auditor, Melissa Welhausen, that KMA Broadcasting and The Valley News in Shenandoah, Page County Iowa had tried to interfere with the local elections by posting false news on social media then deleting the information afterwards to hide their lies. Jennifer had also discussed with Melissa, that she had discovered that Clarinda, Iowa had also chimed in with their own corrupt scheme. The only answer that was given to Jennifer, was that voters should have called into the county auditor's office for the voting time where they would be told it would be from 11am to 8pm. It would be apparent to Jennifer that even the Page County Auditor would try her hand at a little bit of corruption. For those who don't know, 8am to 8pm is the normal voting time. (starting at 7am could be accepted).

     In March of 2018, there would be an audit of Shenandoah, Iowa where a debt of 10 million dollars would be the only downside. By that time, Jennifer knew that the city should be considered for other debts including the grants and loans that had been taken out after the last several years totaling about 100 million dollars if not more. Jennifer would soon take action upon this theory. 

     In April of 2018, Jennifer would contact Page County Auditor, Melissa Welhausen by email about the theory of Shenandoah, Iowa being in debt with at least 100 million dollars of grants and loans. There would be no answer back. Then Jennifer would email the then state auditor, Mary Mosiman, about the audit done on Shenandoah, Iowa and that the city had 100 million dollars in grants and loans that was unknown if they were being paid back. Mary would scornfully back the 10 million dollar debt and leave it at that. It may have left Jennifer a little discouraged, but she wouldn't give up. 

     By June of 2018, Jennifer had already formed a plan to take on the election interference and was slowly handing out her idea in hopes that it would be the piece to fit the puzzle. At about this time, Jennifer would join the Page County Iowa Democrats at their Shenandoah, Iowa meetings only. She would expose the idea of opening a building for use for the Page County Iowa Democrats for multiple activities. 

     In July 2018, Jennifer would send her idea of election security to Secretary of State, Paul Pate, where he would boast about the idea, claiming it was his. In August of 2018, Jennifer would attend another Page County Iowa Democratic meeting and then would sign on to work with then Iowa House District 24 candidate, James Uhlenkamp when he appeared in Shenandoah, Iowa. It should be noted that Gregory T. Christensen was also working for James Uhlenkamp from Omaha, Nebraska. Jennifer would also give out her idea of election security to then 2020 Presidential Candidate, Elizabeth Warren, where she would then start calling out for election security bills. 

     On September 3, 2018, a beloved dog of Jennifer's would pass away and she would then decide to go full force with the local Democratic party on the first Spring meeting in 2019. On September 8th and 9th, 2018, Jennifer would knock doors with candidate James Uhlenkamp to try and get him elected. Between the two days, the most exciting part was that Jennifer got to meet with at least 7 millennials who lived in her precinct. Jennifer would donate money to his campaign and pay for a t-shirt in support. At the end of the month, Jennifer would appear in the Shenfest parade on behalf of James Uhlenkamp and with the other Page County Iowa Democrats to get other Democrats elected. In this same month, Jennifer would send her idea to stop election hacking to the Chief Associate of Technology in Washington D.C.

   *In September of 2018, Gregory T. Christensen would follow Jennifer on Twitter after gaining insight that she was working for James Uhlenkamp in which he was too, but not visible yet. She would remember him, but would keep working. 

     In October of 2018, there would be a fused meeting of the Page County Iowa Democrats and candidates for Iowa House Districts 23 and 24. Jennifer would attend this meeting and donate money for a t-shirt with the Southwest Iowa Democrats labeling on it. During October 2018, CNN would write up an article stating that they had received word that the federal level received an idea that was just enough to save the November 2018 election hacking. 

     In November of 2018, the election security must have worked because the House and Senate at the federal level had been stabilized instead of having an overwhelming amount of Democrats on both levels. Democrats had taken over the House while Republicans remained a hold on the Senate. Notable Iowans who would be elected to the state and federal levels as Democrats are Cindy Axne for Iowa's District 3, Abby Finkenauer for Iowa's District 1, and Rob Sand for Iowa State Auditor. 

     On March 19, 2019, Jennifer decided to go full throttle with the local Page County Iowa Democrats. This first meeting was a Get-to-Know-You meeting after electing temporary positions for the year. Jennifer took local positions sitting as a co-chairman for Precinct 1 in Shenandoah and a co-chairman to serve on the Third District Central Committee. The rest of the year would be back and forth meetings in Shenandoah and Clarinda along with activities such as Footnote Friday and Ladies Night. Notable parades would be: Red Oak Junction Days in June, Shenandoah 4th of July parade in July, another Southwest Iowa 4th of July parade in July, Sidney Iowa Rodeo parade in August, Essex Labor Day Parade in September, Hamburg Popcorn Days Parade in September, and the Shenfest Parade in September. 

   *On March 19, 2019, Gregory T. Christensen would finally meet Jennifer and they would shake hands on any deal that went on in Gregory's head. 

   *In April 2019, presidential candidate, John Delaney would make a stop in Shenandoah.

     In late May to early June of 2019, Jennifer would send in two proposals to Attorney General Tom Miller to make the claim of breaking money matters in Election Security Laws at the local and state levels. She would also send a proposal to Rob Sand about auditing any political party from breaking any money matters in Election Security Laws in the future. 

   *On June 19, 2019, Jennifer would start IA Mil MAFFA and Gregory would take interest. 

   *Jennifer and Gregory would work on flood cleanup in Pacific Junction along with other Southwest Iowa Democrats and campaign staffers from multiple Democratic presidential campaigns over the months of June, July, and August. 

   *Jennifer and Gregory would watch the debates being aired on television starting in June. 

     In July of 2019, Pete Buttigieg would make a stop in Shenandoah, Iowa where people from Iowa, Nebraska, Missouri, and Kansas would show up in numbers. It was calculated to be 300 to 400 people that evening. Was this a sign of something? Who knew what would be next. 

     In August of 2019, Jennifer would play her hand by running for City Councilman at Large. She kept up the battle. The next people to sign up for positions were Cindy Arman who also gave the City Councilman at Large a second shot and Jon Eric Brantner for Ward 2 a second shot. All 3 appeared in the Shenfest parade in September. 

   *In September of 2019, there would be a Keeping Southwest Iowa on the Map get together at a church in Sidney, Iowa. Jennifer and Gregory would attend where Jennifer would try and get a former schoolmate, Peter Johnson, elected for Sidney, Iowa mayor. It was a success. 

   *In October of 2019, Jennifer and the other candidates running for city positions would be on KMA Broadcasting in the evening over the radio. 

     In November of 2019, local elections were held and Jennifer would only win 110 votes (including hers) while Cindy Arman won City Councilman at Large and Jon Eric Brantner would win Ward 2. Other progressives would take small local seats. Could Jennifer have helped local candidates win spots? One could only hope. 

     In December of 2019, Amy Klobuchar would hold a meet and greet in Clarinda, Iowa where it would garner about 150 people. On December 28, 2019, the DNC chose Bernie Sanders as their candidate they would stand behind (the second time he was chosen even after his 2016 failed attempt). The next day, December 29, 2019, Elizabeth Warren would appear in Clarinda, Iowa for a meet and greet where an upwards of 250 people showed up. Jennifer would choose to work with her campaign that day because she decided that there wouldn't be another Hillary Clinton and Bernie Sanders type scenario again. Would it be the perfect fit? One could only hope. The reason why could be read at: https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/2438084875185794178/6146112809079033445

   *In December of 2019, Jennifer and Gregory would attend a Signs Up 2020 party at a local businessman's house where other people and campaign staffers would show up. 

   *In January of 2020, Jennifer would work for the Elizabeth Warren campaign even if Gregory decided to play a prank during that time. It wouldn't stop Jennifer from being focused on her candidate. 

     February 3, 2020 would be caucus night where Elizabeth Warren would win 2/3 of Shenandoah precincts (other precincts are unknown in Page County). It was foretold that Elizabeth Warren had won the vast majority of rural Southwest Iowa and had the endorsement of the Des Moines Register. According to Iowa societal rules, that's usually how you win the state of Iowa (the same position that Hillary Clinton won in 2016). The best part was that millennials showed up in numbers. It was decided that Bernie Sanders and Pete Buttigieg would take a tie in the caucuses. Was this a subtle sign to something? Who knew. 

   *Jennifer had lost her positions with the Page County Iowa Democrats at the caucus in a way not aligned with the Iowa Democratic Party. 

   *In February of 2020, Jennifer and Gregory would watch the last debate. 

   *On February 18, 2020, would be the last meeting for the Page County Iowa Democrats in the beginning of the year where caucuses and such would be talked about. 

     As of March 17, 2020, that's when "A Panoramic Viewpoint" would start. Jennifer would fend off this disease like she knew how. By being herself the whole time (and you should just be yourself too). At first it wasn't that serious and it was just neutral. She would be persisting for the economy easily. Then the government decided to make it stricter around the end of October 2020 or the beginning of November 2020. On November 3, was the election. Jennifer felt how she should really vote. (FYI: "The Panoramic Viewpoint" is just numerology, but if you wore a mask, you were subtly saying that "Unity of the Future" stinks)

   *In the June Iowa primaries, nobody would vote for a president. See here at these links: 

Link 1- https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F-w3dEL0ok80m9rE_C3NKOvrOTRe9AAT/view?usp=sharing

Link 2- https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FO1JvFd8VsQ7yVVAfHkcNITiC_VJ9ny2/view?usp=sharing

Link 3- https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FP-z9uMclDIIGq3DD7_cKZQ9l2adfm6d/view?usp=sharing

   Only to try and make up for the mistake in November. View the ballot at this link: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F0t7ZTmLcgRYqrVKH6x-KKbNSMUVRm95/view?usp=sharing

   *Jennifer would Persist for the economy even with stricter restrictions put in place. Jennifer would also know that Joe Biden is not the Democratic Candidate to be leading the country. You can read about it here: https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/2438084875185794178/7347187075658955137

   *In years past (2017 or 2018) Jennifer would make the statement that people should be able to call in to vote for candidates, which would catch the Nevada Democrats attention after the Iowa Democratic Party accepted the idea. The DNC would turn down the idea. 

   *Jennifer would make the suggestion to open up more caucus sites because a lot of people had inaccessibility to the original caucus sites. The idea would be accepted. 

   *Jennifer would also continue her project through 2020 and beyond. 

For the link to the 2020 Iowa Caucus results on my behalf, you can read it here: http://jennyelliott1988.blogspot.com/2021/02/iowa-caucus-2020.html

     *While persisting for the economy starting near March 17, 2020 to about August 5, 2021, things would change over the next 5 months or more after that if you paid attention. Some would love it, some would like it, some would be neutral about it, and then others would either hate or fear it. Whatever it was, it caused reactions of all sorts. 

   *Gregory would distance himself from Jennifer over the Panoramic Viewpoint on behalf of money matters to "supposedly show" how much greed the federal government had to only hurt himself psychologically. 

     For the last 5 years, Gregory would play his hand trying to win a spot with Jennifer on the IA MASTARS team. He would be successful and they would be known as the Iowans Making America Stronger Together Again ReligiouslySpeaking. 

       ~Welcome to Centrist U Gregory T. Christensen! 

      -A hearty thank you goes out to all the millennials and many others who inspired us. 

     *To read about Gregory T. Christensen, you can go to these links: 

   Link 1- www.gregorychristensen.org

   Link 2- http://GregoryChristensen.org/

   Link 3-  

linktr.ee/christeg 

      Note: Not all links may be for mobile read. A computer may be needed to read with links. 

To read about the MASTA Plan, you can read it here: https://ready4jenny.blogspot.com/2021/05/the-masta-plan.html

Kids Not On Chemicals (KNOC)

  

    Do you know how many people are on chemicals? What exactly are these chemicals and what are they doing to human life? 

     What if I told you that millions of Americans are on chemicals. Those chemicals are prescription drugs. What if I told you that these drugs are suppose to save human lives, but they slowly kill people, if not kill someone quickly due to the side effects. We always believe that people actually die from an actual disease and never blame the side effects of these medications that they take for a disease or diseases. Why are we a nation that forces drugs on people? Don't we know that the chemicals in drugs are more harmful than the diseases themselves? 

     That's where politics plays a role. It's more likely that Republicans are the ones who push all sorts of chemicals on people. They are the ones that fill the heads of doctors that they should be pushing chemicals on their patients that they know aren't safe. Democrats, you aren't out of the woods on this either. You too try to push chemicals on people that you believe need it. You are all for saving lives and you think that chemicals can save people's lives. That's where both Democrats and Republicans deny science. Science has proved that the chemicals in drugs are unsafe for human consumption and can do more harm than good, but still produce these drugs anyway. Have you noticed that more prescription pills are announced during a time when Republicans are in control than when Democrats are in control? 

     Big Pharma makes more money during a Republican ruling than when Democrats are in control. That's because Republicans pour their money into harming people with these drugs and force them on you without you realizing it. Then Republicans pay insurance companies to jack up the price of these drugs and then these insurance companies along with Big Pharma pay back Republicans for each death that happens when people take these drugs. Democrats aren't out of the clear on this one too. They know that these drugs are out here to do more harm than good and know the very specifics that are going on with Republicans, but are afraid to admit it. 

     That's a reason to try and find alternative medicine. Alternative medicine is never cleared by the FDA due to them knowing that these healthy alternatives are better for people than the prescription drugs that you take and they are failing to admit it. Republicans will never say a word about this and Democrats can't admit the failure. People are more likely to overdose on prescription medication than alternative medications. Doctors are always pushing out deadly drugs making it seem that they make money from Big Pharma if they do. What if I told you that doctors do get a small fee from drug companies and Big Pharma (and possibly insurance companies) for pushing deadly drugs on people. We claim that doctors are out here trying to save lives, but when in turn, they are trying to kill people with deadly drugs. What if I told you that insurance companies will pay doctors a small fee if a patient dies while on a drug. The more drugs you take, the more money doctors will make from drug and insurance companies. 

     Even if a person is slowly taken off a drug and then it's stopped, do you know how long that drug can actually stay in the human body? What if I told you that yes, a shorter amount of time for a drug, the shorter amount of time it can stay in the system. Doctors claim that even if a patient takes a drug and then eventually doesn't need the drug, it won't stay in the human body for very long. The only way to clear the human body of the toxic chemicals after a long duration would be through a detox or cleanse. That would mean eating right and drinking gallons of water over a long period of time. We also have chemicals on our food and in our water, which will prolong the detox. We claim that our genetic make up is to blame for our inconsistencies with being a normal human being. What if I told you that years of chemicals (yes, including climate change) was to blame for changing people's DNA. Doctors won't admit this, because they are blinded with getting money from wherever they can. Doctors will claim that they are in the profession to save lives, but subconsciously they are in it for the money. 

    Then there are the youth and kids in foster care and placement homes of all sorts. What if I told you that the state not only pays these people to take care of them, but to push medications on the youth so they can be numb and not rise up against the government. Who does such a thing? More Republicans are likely to follow this idea than Democrats. That's where it's now different within the last 4 years. Democrats have now embraced the idea that millennials and the youth are the future and they should have a voice in the government and in their lives. Democrats no longer want millennials and the youth to be numb to all of the possibilities. It seems as though over the last 4 years, Democrats have embraced the idea that those of the future should be open minded. Now that is a situation where we can Move America Forward For All. If we can keep electing Democrats who are open minded and do have a heart for the people, then we can Move America Forward For All at a steady pace. The more we can call out the faults of our past, the more we can make a better future for those around us. 

     A measure should be put in place such as my idea (the title of the article). Kids should not be forced on medications at an early age just because inside or outside stimulants or chemicals are actually to blame. I believe that causing the youth to be on prescription medication at an early age numbs them to finding out who they really are or who they are meant to be. Why are we numbing our youth who are more than willing to see what the world has for them? They are our future and chemicals aren't the best thing for them. Do realize that alternative medicine is out there for our youth even though the FDA won't clear it as well knowing that it's safer for them. So we need to be calling out the FDA and CDC when it comes to man made chemicals. 

   Even if we cut the costs of drugs, it would be a big incentive for doctors to over prescribe medications just to get more money. That's exactly what they will do. It may be cheaper for the patients of these medications, but it would turn into a 50/50 profit from the patients and then for doctors/Big Pharma. Insurance companies would just be the middle man between the two like they always have been. Let's say you have depression. Instead of getting just one pill a day, you could be taking multiple during the day. Doctors just love to over medicate when they can. That's why it's up to the general public to do their work and stop this from happening. There have been medical professionals who are slowly coming out of the woodwork telling people that the medications that they are taking for one disease is possibly causing another or more. You could be taking a medicine for Depression, but it could be causing you to get cancer or some other disease. That's how doctors over medicate people. You take one pill for one disease and it causes more issues and then you get more medication for the issues that one pill gave you. We are even doing this to our youth and the FDA and CDC don't care as long as they get incentive money to make pills that cause all sorts of issues even if they work in treating diseases. 

   That's why we should rebel against the FDA and CDC by buying into the alternative medicine world. Alternative medicine has been tested to some degree to treat issues and people have said that alternative medicine did the same thing as man made pills, if not better. The FDA forces these alternative medicine producers to have the warning that all natural medicine is "not to treat or intended to treat" any disease. They are trying to get people to refrain from all natural medicine so they can make money off of people dying from their man made medicine (yes, that's where some funding from taxpayers goes. It's almost like paying for your own death to these companies and whatnot). In a new world where we are now accepting the use of cannabis and just recently MDMA (magic mushrooms), we should now embrace the bigger world of alternative medicine. Alternative medicine is actually created by small businesses and some of us are taught to "shop small." So we should be turning to alternative medicine now as we are slowly embracing this kind of lifestyle. How proud could a country be if their people could be on alternative medicine and live long healthy lives without the thought of dying from man made medicine on some people's minds? It would be an incredible thought. So think before you buy and your body and mind will greatfully thank you with something you should have been blessed with in the beginning. 

A Penny Thoughts

       Has anyone had the chance to think about this COVID-19 measure? What if it was just something that's in your head for no reason? What is the explanation to COVID-19? 

       As this so called "disease" has been rambling on for a little more than 8 months now, nobody has decided that enough is enough. At least currently anyway. About a week or two ago, the economy was "Building Backwards Better" at a great speed until someone in the government said "Enough building backwards better!" What if that government official was Joe Biden? GASP! Joe Biden supposedly has plans to Build Back Better the economy, but can't Move America Forward For All because he's stuck on COVID-19 and doesn't know how to stop it. We already know that Donald Trump couldn't do it. 

       What if I told you that Barack Obama finally opened up recently about COVID or any disease that was created under his administration and explained that it's "To get Republicans to work with us" type of disease (watch Barack Obama's 60 Minutes interview here: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mAFv55o47ok) To find out that Democrats have been using diseases to get Republicans to work with them doesn't come as a surprise to some, but could shock the nation. Why would someone do such a thing? 

       Can any Democratic Official explain why they have to use diseases to get Republicans to work with them? To scare your opposition along with the public is not an official way to Move America Forward For All. It's always a setback and it's normally used up to at least 3 to 4 months. This "disease" has lasted over twice as long and has been proven that's it's ineffective. So what do we do now? The answer is simple. What if we applied the principle that Barack Obama once spoke of, which is, "If you don't like it, you can leave." What does that mean? It means that if you don't want to live and work for a Democracy, then you can leave the country and form your own opposition in another country. 

       Why would someone move to another country? What if I told you that there would be other countries that could accept Americans because they know they love to travel and have a different experience than what they are accustomed to. The United States isn't as lenient on travel as other countries are. GASP! WHY? Apparently the United States has been involved in so many wars that they have now become a target to terrorists. WHY? What if some of those countries are subtly trying to say that they are tired of the United States always stepping into business that shouldn't be theirs? We should have thought that the Russian hacking of the 2016 elections was a given clue if not the nod to stop being the "Dictator" of the world. 

       Now we have a war at home and it's affecting the world. This "issue" shouldn't be an issue to anyone. Yet again, COVID-19 is a subtle sign that the United States is once again the "Dictator" of the world. This IS a big issue! The United States should NEVER be the "Dictator" of the world. It should focus on it's own people and fix their own issues before getting into business with other countries. That's what the G20 Summits and other big meetings are for. They are just to discuss what's going on in each country and maybe take home some information that could be useful. They are also meant to bring leaders together to find common ground to all their wars and to try and find peace amidst them all. Right now we are all in a common war and guess who HAS to stop this war? If you guessed the United States, then you would be right. How are we going to do that? 

       Do you know who we voted for currently? If you said Joe Biden, you may be in for a surprise. We should already know that Joe Biden can't stop this "war" because his ideals would almost kill people or form an opposition to him eventually. That's not a good sign for Democrats. What if I told you that you could have a sigh of relief from both candidates. As we know Iowa is the first state to have it's primaries (if you didn't know, you do now). Who did Iowa really vote for? These comments come from Iowa's Secretary of State, Paul Pate via Twitter (Read in the link): https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F-w3dEL0ok80m9rE_C3NKOvrOTRe9AAT/view?usp=sharing. Are these statements really true? 

Have a peek at a Democratic ballot in June: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FO1JvFd8VsQ7yVVAfHkcNITiC_VJ9ny2/view?usp=sharing. 

Now have a look at a Republican ballot in June: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1FP-z9uMclDIIGq3DD7_cKZQ9l2adfm6d/view?usp=sharing. 

        Is this a coincidence? What if all parties were on all ballots in the November Iowa elections to make up for the mistake that was made in June. Read a ballot here: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1F0t7ZTmLcgRYqrVKH6x-KKbNSMUVRm95/view?usp=sharing.

       This is just one city in Iowa. Who knows what was going on in other cities in Iowa. That's why it's important to check you ballot status. Who knows what the other states that had primaries were doing. BUT WAIT! What if Iowa decided to integrate a new method in their June Primaries called "Election Integrity." Where did this come from? What if I told you that it was an Elizabeth Warren campaign promise? What if Iowa Secretary of State, Paul Pate decided to use this idea for the Iowa primaries then decided for the November ballots that everyone had the right to choose who they wanted to vote for no matter what their political affiliation was. Is this another Elizabeth Warren campaign promise or could it be a Centrist thought? 

       What if Iowa in a social sense would have chosen Elizabeth Warren as the Democratic Presidential Nominee? It was foretold that Elizabeth Warren had done an awesome job on carrying rural Southwest Iowa (except for Page County, Iowa) in the Iowa caucus and also got the Des Moines Register endorsement. Does this sound familiar? How about that Hillary Clinton had the same thing happen to her. She too had carried rural Southwest Iowa and got the Des Moines Register endorsement, but apparently let Donald Trump have the spotlight to see what he could do (and possibly teach the United States a lesson). What is the lesson? Are we sure that we are ready to Move America Forward For All? It seems as though America is screaming it. The people voted for Hillary Clinton after a two term president with Barack Obama. If that wasn't a hint that America wanted to Move Forward For All then maybe we should also think about who should really be the presidential nominee. Is Elizabeth Warren ready to Move America Forward For All? One account believes she is: https://www.blogger.com/blog/post/edit/2438084875185794178/6146112809079033445

       Now we wait for the United State's response... 

   *Note: all links may be computer read only. 

#TeamJoe? Think again...

   As Joe Biden embarks on his No Malarkey tour as the Democratic Presidential nominee according to the Democratic National Committee (DNC), let's ask ourselves if Uncle Joe is actually fit to be president. Let's find out: 

   Reason 1- He's attacked all sorts of people. 

     If you haven't watched the presidential debates, I'll break down some focal points to this reason. He's attacked the DACA program (Remember how DACA students called Joe out and created an uproar where the students had to be escorted out? Which would definitely prove that people of color threaten him). He's attacked abortion rights (There were women in the crowd to call him out and hold up signs which would prove that women are a threat to him). He's attacked his female presidential candidate coworkers (Of course you have seen him attack Amy Klobuchar, Elizabeth Warren, and Kamala Harris, which again would show that women are a threat to him). He's even attacked his male presidential candidate coworkers of color (Cory Booker, Julian Castro, and Andrew Yang just to prove again that the colored community is a threat to him). He even went on to attack Pete Buttigieg (which also proves that millennials and the LGBTQ+ community are a threat to him). Just remember that the very same people that he's attacked, are the very same people (the VIPs) of this day and age to represent who becomes president or we could see another Trump term whether it be Trump himself or Joe Biden to carry out a Trump-like term. 

   Which brings me to reason number two: 

   Reason 2- His plan is to carry out a Trump term whether you see it or not.

     Joe has been asked to release his tax returns and a list of his donors, which he hasn't complied with [Revised August 25th, 2020] Ask yourselves if he has openly listed his tax returns and list of donors to the public [Does anyone know where you can find this information?] (sound familiar?). Besides trying to follow the money, guess who his possible prominent VP pick is? It might be no other than John Delaney, the self-made millionaire mogul/ former Representative from Maryland (sounding even more familiar?). So far, only one woman has come out against Joe for sexual harassment, which if Joe were elected, more women would come forward against him (Seeing it yet? Almost there). All this would cause an uproar for an investigation to be called upon, which could take who knows how long and Joe would try to interfere (Got it? I hope you do). [Revised August 25th, 2020] Do realize that his campaign slogan is Build Back Better. It's almost trying to copy the BBB (Better Business Bureau). Also try to see a hidden message that it could imply the meaning to be Building Backwards Better (Democratic form of MAGA). 

   Which brings me to reason number three:

   Reason 3- Joe Biden has a shady past. 

     I would like to thank Gregory T. Christensen who wrote the novel Make America Stronger Together Again for making me realize this theory:

   Back in 2016, people were urging Joe to run for president. Joe finally said "No" after the fact that Trump had already stirred up the "her emails" against Hillary Clinton and the "birther" movement against Barack Obama. Had Joe tried to run for president, could Trump find something on Joe and not only make Barack Obama look bad, give Democrats a bad look (a strike three), show Joe Biden really had a shady past, but most importantly, give Trump a second term? Joe may have been smart, but not smart enough as I have caught him red handed trying to play the Trump Handbook in Democratic form. [Revised August 25th, 2020] There is currently an attack ad made by Trump on YouTube which now shows you what should have been brought to light almost 4 years ago. I support the link and you can watch the video here: https://youtu.be/qOradie8WzI

     And finally reason number four:

     

     Reason 4- Joe Biden doesn't have any plans for America. 

        Just like Donald Trump, he's making up plans as he goes and using them to gain votes. But ask yourself, is anyone actually writing these plans down or is Joe Biden just talking about issues as they come up? It seems as though Joe Biden is using another tactic from the Trump Playbook. Also remember that in debates, he was always arguing with the other candidates which made him have the least amount of talking time on the stage even though he was seen as a top candidate. This actually does prove that he doesn't have plans for America and he may even try to destroy America some more. (Remember it's the same tactic used by Trump when he was on the debate stages with the other Republicans)

     [Revised August 25th, 2020] The results for the Iowa Primary should not be shocking, but it will be. Lo and behold, the Iowa Secretary of State used a new method not yet listed as a notable requirement to have that can be used. It's called the "Good Faith Clause." It's where the Secretary of State gets to use "good faith" or otherwise known as good judgment as to whether presidential candidates end up being listed on the ballots or not if the Secretary of State believes they have what it takes to lead America or decide that they don't have the requirements to lead America. Iowa was the first state to use this method and it is highly possible that all the other states that have had their primaries have used the same method. It should be investigated so America can know the truth. I will share a link that will lead you to a photo of the Democratic ballot not listing Joe Biden as the Democratic Presidential Nominee: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1BdZQf2I8oxF0gAgUrziio3rJxGjAp5_U/view?usp=drivesdk

   *Sidenote: do realize that Joe Biden is stirring up a lot of Republican support. I believe these Republicans do realize that Joe Biden is the Democratic form of Donald Trump and would definitely stir up another Trump term if elected. Also realize that Republicans have always been the issue almost these last 4 years indefinitely, but to keep them here would stir up more trouble for the Democrats and that's a mess that Democrats don't need in this day and age. It would strain their progress to move America forward for all. 

    So you really need to ask yourself, do you really want a Trump second term no matter how it's served? 

   During this pandemic (COVID-19), we are realizing a lot. How about realizing that Joe Biden is living a malarkey life? Which we should ask if Joe Biden has Coronavirus. How do we find out? Investigate him deeply before he gets the chance to be president. I'M CALLING FOR IT! 

   You know what's really important to keep this from happening? We vote for Women, People of Color, People of the LGBTQ+ Community, but most importantly Millennials all who decide to run up and down all ballots everywhere, because these people are our future. 

     WE ARE READY! 

Team Elizabeth Warren!

   Here is why I believe Elizabeth Warren should be the next president, but let me start with an opener. 

  Elizabeth Warren and I have quite a few things in common. We are both from the Midwest where it's the epicenter of knowing about all the struggles, taking them on headfirst while helping people in return. We are both smart blondes. We both have Native American history. We both grew up in poor families and would somehow find success. She is a liberal Democrat, while I am a Centrist Democrat and we can agree on a lot of things. The most important one would be, we are both intimidating women (more on that later). 

  Why Elizabeth Warren should be president reason number 1: She has a policy for almost everything! Her plans may not be perfect, but who has the most policies that cover nearly every struggle of every American? She does! What policy does she not have? She's definitely a problem solver for sure! 

  Why Elizabeth Warren should be president reason number 2: She has the brains! Even though she is getting up in age, her mentality is highly intact. She knows what she's talking about and can perfectly align problems and solve them with an honest answer. Age is just a number for her! 

  Why Elizabeth Warren should be president reason number 3: She's got the "it" factor! By it factor, I mean she's the most intimidating amidst all the other candidates. Why would all the other candidates attack her? They know that she is the most powerful and has the right attitude and right policies to get things done. She can be seen as the "perfect Centrist" even though she claims herself as a liberal. How can you not forget that by societal standards, she's the next Hillary Clinton! 

  So Elizabeth Warren is an awesome and amazing woman! If I could choose her Vice President pick it would be Kamala Harris. Having a double woman team is the best idea in beating Donald Trump and continuing on with positive change for a good two terms. 

  If you want the positive and right change for the country, then Elizabeth Warren is it! 

     Elizabeth Warren 2020!